|
|
|
|
Community Access to the In-situ Urban Archaeological Heritage as Illustrated by Case Studies in Trondheim, Norway
Ref.: 59
Área temática:
01 Integridad física de los paisajes urbanos históricos
Fecha de recepción:
15/11/2008
AUTORES (* Autor principal)
E. PEACOCK, Elizabeth
* (Noruega)
-
Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU)
ABSTRACT
Large-scale archaeological excavations of the medieval cultural levels in the city of Trondheim, Norway began in the 1970s as the result of
extensive urban renewal, and continued through the mid-1990s. During this period, not only were large numbers of well-preserved artefacts
of all material groups recovered, but also substantial architectural structures were uncovered. Quite early on, the decision was taken not
only to incorporate some of these architectural features into the new buildings erected - instead of removing them - but also to make these
ruins accessible to the public. Three projects in particular stand out: the Sparbanken bank building, the Trondheim City Library, and the
Museum of the Archbishops' Palace.
The first project, in the late 1970s, entailed the ruins of one of Trondheim's early stone
churches discovered under what was to become a bank building. These remains were incorporated into the basement of the bank,
accessible during opening hours, and included a small exhibition of artefacts. The second project followed about 10 years' later.
Architectural features uncovered on the site of the new city library were also incorporated into the new building, and are now seen daily by
hundreds of library users. The final project, yet another ten years' later, involves the integration of the archaeological remains of several
medieval workshops and substantial portions of a precinct wall with the subterranean exhibition area of a major national museum that now
stands on the site.
These urban archaeological windows are very different in their method of integration, public accessibility,
financing, maintenance, host institution outreach commitment, and overall success, and well illustrate different approaches to offering local
citizens (stakeholders) insights into their common buried cultural heritage.
BIBLIOGRAFÍA
|
|